the closing of MegaUpload has benefits the legal offer? A hasty assumption

Analyzes – 25,7%, c’ is the rise d’ enregistr&amp goes down for hearing; eacute; E by Wrestling-Up TV and the VOD continuation &worsen; the closing of MegaUpload d’ aprè S estimates of Hadopi. However, l’ analysis relates only to the 12 days which followed closing and account d&amp does not hold; rsquo; a é ventuel carryforward d’ goes down for hearing towards alternative services of té lé direct loading and the P2P.

Unusual fact, Hadopi its?? Does A©tait fA©licitA©e in January of the closing of MegaUpload by the autoritA©s amA©ricaines have?? unusual because jusqua?? With  prA©sent, High the autoritA© refused to come to a conclusion about legal actions in progress, which is the case of?? MegaUpload business.

In, Hadopi reconsiders on March 7 the effects (provisional?) of the diffA©rents sites of the MegaUpload family.

+25% for Wrestling-Up TV and +35% for the VOD

On the basis of?? agrA©gation of several sources of donnA©es, of which the figures da?? goes down for hearing of MA©diamA©trie/NetRatings (A©chantillon of 50 sites reprA©sentant the various forms D `offers lA©gale), Hadopi A©value has  26% of?? goes down for hearing daily average of the platforms lA©gales between?? before and?? aprA¨s closing of MegaUpload.

has 

has “In my? me time, one notes a reduction of 20% of the median number of daily unique visitors on the sites of streaming, between the pA©riode of 1st at January 18, 2012 and that of the 18 at January 31 20123 has” additions Hadopi.

High the autoritA© calculates thus that?? goes down for hearing (daily unique visitors) has augmentA© of 25% for Wrestling-Up TV (tA©lA©vision of correction), of 35% and 85% for the agrA©gateurs/portails. With “On the whole of the segments, the profit is supA©rior has  reduction in?? constatA©e goes down for hearing on sites of streaming free (- 19,5%). With”

the rise of the TV of correction, a “; basic tendency “; however

“This report its?? explain certainly by dA©placement users towards the directly substitutable, accessible lA©gales offers on the Web since a personal computer has” still comments on Hadopi.

Several prA©cautions are however has  to take. Can’t the growth enregistrA©e by Wrestling-Up TV its?? to explain only by?? arrA? T of MegaUpload. With “This growth of the tA©lA©vision of correction reinforces a basic tendency, since over one year, one notes a rise of the consumption of Wrestling-Up TV of 67% has” takes da?? elsewhere care of prA©ciser?? A©tude.

Moreover, only the effects has  are short term of here mesurA©s, the pA©riode da?? analyzes finishing on January 31. However in SuA¨de, country of PirateBay?? da adoption?? a law on the protection of the intellectual propriA©tA© (IPRED) had caused a sharp decline of traffic Internet. This dA©clin its?? A©tait following and returned a©tait traffic has  its initial level.

Quid of tA©lA©chargement direct and the P2P?

In light, if a carryforward da?? goes down for hearing towards da?? is other sources of consumption of contents probable, for has? tre pA©renne this phA©nomA¨ne nA©cessite undoubtedly also A©volution of?? offer lA©gale – what the closing of MegaUpload N `does not have provoquA©e. A dA©crochage has  to leave January 29 on the VOD has  this title has …

Canal+ reproaches has Google and Apple not to play has equal footings

Business – In a platform published in Le Monde, Bertrand Meheut, competition d&amp criticizes; eacute; honest of the actors d’ Internet like Google and Apple. L’ future of the ciné my is menacé according to the pré sident of Canal+. Or this is Canal+ which is menacé by this new competition?

In a platform publiA©e in the world, prA©sident it of Canal+, Bertrand Meheut, delivers itself has  a criticism of?? A©volution of?? competing environment in the sector of?? audio-visual. In “Jusqu `has  prA©sent, the mA©dias groups franA§ais delivered a keen competition, but with rA¨gles of the play which A©taient my? my for all: a framework rA©glementaire and tax single has” comments on the owner thus.

But here are, the traditional actors must dA©sormais to take into account new actors, and in particular the companies of?? Internet, of which Google and Apple. However, according to Bertrand Meheut, has “the new forms of competition which take shape have tendency has  S `to free from these rA¨gles. We see apparaA®tre new offers whose mode of A©chappe distribution has  very forced rA©glementaire or tax. With”

tax Dumping in Europe from Ireland and Luxembourg

the leader points the bA©nA©fices thus directly tax tirA©s of their establishment by Apple and Google, whose siA¨ges europA©ens are basA©s respectively and in Ireland, two countries which made argument to attract the companies.

In addition to, tax incentives (impA/ts and VAT) whose these new entrants bA©nA©ficient, Bertrand Meheut their reproach of not does not have? tre subjected to my? my obligations, and in particular financing of?? audio-visual franA§ais.

the dA©bat Na?? is. The question of the financing of the crA©ation and of?? audio-visual (but also of rA©seaux) still A©tA© dA©battue has rA©cemment has  ?? occasion da?? in SA©nat on the fiscalitA© of the numA©rique one. ?? idA©e da?? a Google tax has thus.

the TV connectA©e redistributes the charts

Au-dela  question of the fiscalitA©, Ca?? is a battle on?? future of?? audio-visual and of the division of the value that the actors of the sector deliver themselves, of which Canal+. The tA©lA©vision connectA©e threat indeed of rebattre charts. And not its” R which the groups as Canal+ comes out from it big winners.

the battle is thus also (especially?) competing. And to slow down?? entrA©e of the actors of the Web, the chaA®nes are prA? your has  to forget their rivalitA©s, at the point of aiming has  to frame the ambitions of the gA©ants sA©vA¨rement Web in matiA¨re of TV connectA©e.

However, actors traditional of?? audio-visual are conscious of the dilatory nature of these measurements. Launching da?? a free chaA®ne by Canal+ its?? does registered voter thus in a stratA©gie dA©clarA©e have “da?? occupation of the ground. With”

“It has is necessary that we occupy the ground if not it will be conquered by new actors like Google TV, Apple TV, Hulu or Netflix which will dA©ferleront grA? it has  the tA©lA©vision connectA©e. This is A©volution inA©luctable, it is thus necessary to act quickly and dA©velopper the franA§aise production has” Bertrand Meheut, who aujourda?? today seems to call some with the lA©gislator in the name of?? future of the cinA©ma, according to him menacA© by Google and Quatar.